Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of 
Forbesichthys. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Forbesichthys agassizii 100988
Forbesichthys. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Forbesichthys agassizii 100988
Taxonomic Split 108633
(Δημιουργήθηκε στις 05-06-2022)
|
|
διάσπαση σε |
|
Σχόλια
If atlased correctly and sources given for where the species ranges are, I would be in favor of this split.
Προσθήκη σχόλιου
Συνδεθείτε
ή Εγγραφή
για να προσθέσετε σχόλια
This split should not be committed as is since the atlases are not up to date. The way that it is now it will bump IDs for both species back to genus level. Papilliferus did show that it was atlases but it really was not as it had the range covering all of the US (I just edited it back to not active).
Before preforming a split like this the atlases need to be updated and a source needs to be provided that gives a description of the range.