Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by this split may have been replaced with identifications of Forbesichthys. This happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the output taxa. Review identifications of Forbesichthys agassizii 100988

Taxonomic Split 108633 (Δημιουργήθηκε στις 05-06-2022)

EVIDENCE FOR REPEATED LOSS OF SELECTI... (Αναφορά)
Προστέθηκε από wildlandblogger στις Απρίλιος 05, 2022 0954 ΜΜ | Δημιουργήθηκε από riverrat09 στις Ιούνιος 05, 2022
διάσπαση σε

Σχόλια

This split should not be committed as is since the atlases are not up to date. The way that it is now it will bump IDs for both species back to genus level. Papilliferus did show that it was atlases but it really was not as it had the range covering all of the US (I just edited it back to not active).

Before preforming a split like this the atlases need to be updated and a source needs to be provided that gives a description of the range.

Αναρτήθηκε από riverrat09 8 μήνες πριν (Αναφορά)

If atlased correctly and sources given for where the species ranges are, I would be in favor of this split.

Αναρτήθηκε από riverrat09 8 μήνες πριν (Αναφορά)

Προσθήκη σχόλιου

Συνδεθείτε ή Εγγραφή για να προσθέσετε σχόλια