Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by this split may have been replaced with identifications of Otospermophilus. This happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the output taxa. Review identifications of Otospermophilus beecheyi 180007

Taxonomic Split 135004 (Δημιουργήθηκε στις 23-09-2024)

DO NOT COMMIT - LARGE NUMBER OF OBS

Otospermophilus douglasii has been elevated to a full species, accepted in MDD
https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/113/4/1136/2416020
https://academic.oup.com/mspecies/article/48/939/91/2687779

ASM Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) (Αναφορά)
Προστέθηκε από rjq στις Νοέμβριος 23, 2023 1120 ΠΜ | Δημιουργήθηκε από cnddb_brian στις Σεπτέμβριος 23, 2024
διάσπαση σε

Σχόλια

I believe this outlines the basis for the taxonomic change and the range map adjustments, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zaKja9z-rN6tgsJ8dkYy-DQm8YMkcyyo/view?usp=drive_link

Αναρτήθηκε από cnddb_brian 8 μήνες πριν
Αναρτήθηκε από birdwhisperer περίπου 1 μήνας πριν

@loarie please can this be committed, thanks

Αναρτήθηκε από rjq 24 ημέρες πριν

Subspecies swap (O. b. douglasii to O. douglasii) https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_swaps/135021

Αναρτήθηκε από cnddb_brian 4 ημέρες πριν

What's the story with Sacramento County? All of the observations were kicked back to genus. This should be part of O. beecheyi, right? Or am I missing something?

Αναρτήθηκε από alexbinck 4 ημέρες πριν

Thanks for the heads-up @alexbinck, I'll review them. I'm not sure what happened. O. beecheyi was atlased for Sac County, https://www.inaturalist.org/atlases/12. Ah, the atlas for O. douglasii was messed-up (https://www.inaturalist.org/atlases/98999); it included Sac County (and Nevada County). I'll take the blame for this, but not sure how it happened, but this was all set it up and reviewed it last year (whoops!). Sorry.
~Brian

Αναρτήθηκε από cnddb_brian 3 ημέρες πριν

Προσθήκη σχόλιου

Συνδεθείτε ή Εγγραφή για να προσθέσετε σχόλια