along the same lines as the recent Hypomecis/Selidosema update, citing the same source (note 2007 rather than 1999)
"Scoble, M.J. & A. Hausmann [updated 2007]: Online list of valid and available names of the Geometridae of the World [http://www.herbulot.de/globalspecieslist.htm]"
the following Boarmia are problematic
B. curtaria
B. panconita
B. phloeopa (duplicated iNat under Hypomecis) Boarmia accepted by ALA
B. suasaria (duplicated iNat under Hypomecis)
B. phricomita
B. zaloschema
B. driophila
ALA accepted agoraea and pallidiscaria under Hypomecis, everything else is "unplaced".
I read this as placing the existing H. phloeopa and H. suasaria under Boarmia
even though the Geometrid Database of 2007 lists them Hypomecis. I think
the consensus is that Hypomecis is an inappropriate genus and that Boarmia serves as the
placeholder for the "unplaced".
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
Discussion points alluded to above:
along the same lines as the recent Hypomecis/Selidosema update, citing the same source (note 2007 rather than 1999)
"Scoble, M.J. & A. Hausmann [updated 2007]: Online list of valid and available names of the Geometridae of the World [http://www.herbulot.de/globalspecieslist.htm]"
the following Boarmia are problematic
B. curtaria
B. panconita
B. phloeopa (duplicated iNat under Hypomecis) Boarmia accepted by ALA
B. suasaria (duplicated iNat under Hypomecis)
B. phricomita
B. zaloschema
B. driophila
Coff's Butterfly House argues for Boarmia
http://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.com.au/enno/ennominae.html
ALA accepted agoraea and pallidiscaria under Hypomecis, everything else is "unplaced".
I read this as placing the existing H. phloeopa and H. suasaria under Boarmia
even though the Geometrid Database of 2007 lists them Hypomecis. I think
the consensus is that Hypomecis is an inappropriate genus and that Boarmia serves as the
placeholder for the "unplaced".