Almost 6000 observations with no ID at all!
Eek -- there are currently 5863 observations made in Illinois in 2019 that have no label at all!
Link to help identify: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?iconic_taxa=unknown&order_by=random&place_id=35&year=2019
Ways to help with the backlog:
- Add an ID, even if a "coarse" one like kingdom or family can help bring it to the attention of identifiers of these groups
- Mark as captive/cultivated if appropriate (keyboard shortcut is x
- Use the Frequently Used Responses for issues that commonly pop up
It's a common point of confusion with new users why someone would label an observation with an "obvious" identification like "flowering plant" or "insect", so feel free to point them this way if you get pushback: https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/help#coarse-ids
Why do people keep adding "obvious" IDs like "Plants" or "Fungi"?
This usually happens when you did not add an ID yourself, so your observation is sitting in uncategorized limbo. By adding a coarse ID of "Plants" or "Fungi" these identifiers are making it easier for other people to find your observation. Many experts use our taxonomic filters to focus on their taxon of expertise, so if you post an observation of a plant with no identification, these experts will never find it. People adding coarse IDs are almost always trying to help you get more specific IDs.