Several reasons:
-
Confirmation by a specialist adds value.
-
So far, I have found 43 plants misidentified as Sea Grape, Coccoloba uvifera: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?ident_taxon_id=127284&place_id=any&ident_user_id=20600&without_taxon_id=127284. That's almost one percent of all those I've reviewed. 510 plants misidentified as American Jumpseed, Persicaria virginiana: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?ident_taxon_id=144047&place_id=any&ident_user_id=20600&without_taxon_id=144047. That's 4.6 percent of the 11,000 I've reviewed.
-
Of course, I have made a mistake or two myself, but I learn the genus better by seeing many observations.
The same reasons I add annotations confirming identifications on herbarium specimens for species I am familiar with. And in this case, the "annotation" doesn't even take up any real estate on the "specimen".
Posted on
Μάιος 16, 2021 0107 ΠΜ
by
danielatha
Σχόλια
agreed
Προσθήκη σχόλιου