In recent Posts, I have shown previously overlooked variation among the species/subspecies in two genera of bambis, namely Ourebia (https://www.inaturalist.org/journal/milewski/70050-the-three-main-types-of-oribi-ourebia-at-a-glance#) and Raphicerus (https://www.inaturalist.org/journal/milewski/70293-the-bambis-part-9-bleezes-flags-and-semets-in-the-bovid-genus-raphicerus#).
I now turn to another genus of bambis, namely Madoqua (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?place_id=any&taxon_id=42358&view=species).
The species and subspecies of Madoqua may seem too taxonomically complicated for many naturalists to disentangle.
De Jong and Butynski (2017, https://www.lolldaiga.com/wp-content/uploads/De-Jong-Butynski-2017-Madoqua-E-Africa.pdf) have greatly clarified the distinctions among various forms in the kirkii-complex and superficially similar Madoqua guentheri.
However, they seem to have overlooked what is perhaps major variation in adaptive colouration among the species and subspecies in this geographically bewildering set of taxa.
I refer to the incidence, extent, and flaring of whitish pelage on the buttocks - which in some taxa is displayed to potential predators.
What I have noticed, after perusing hundreds of photos, is that there is a range of apparency of white on the hindquarters, as follows:
In M. guentheri, there is a well-developed, white buttock flag (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/85335207). This is normally folded out of sight, but is activated in alarm.
In M. damarensis, there no buttock flag. Furthermore, whitish pelage is absent from the buttocks, being restricted to the inner surface of the uppermost hindleg, where it is obscured from view (https://www.alamy.com/damara-dik-dik-on-arid-landscape-image265477351.html?imageid=9918B4C6-E7A2-4558-A9A9-8A4C5986763B&p=925654&pn=2&searchId=812e1b51f3bb17a7cc79ddae25b30690&searchtype=0), even when the animal flees.
In thomasi and cavendishi, the white pelage on the inner upper hindleg hardly reaches the inner surface of the buttock (cavendishi: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/35760408 ; cavendishi/thomasi: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/19457512).
Instead, there is a darkened effect, owing to the grey, grizzled pelage on the inner buttock being viewed from a certain angle (also see https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/16658138 and https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-a-damara-dik-dik-antelope-in-tarangire-national-park-tanzania-125863282.html?imageid=D2243709-A771-41B3-8555-80339AB1FF98&p=149870&pn=1&searchId=a091ff7a0a8c31eef18a8931488c16a4&searchtype=0).
In nominate kirkii and (to a lesser extent?) hindei, considerable whitish is normally apparent on the buttocks. It remains unknown whether this can be activated by piloerection.
What emerges is that, w.r.t. the colouration of the buttocks, the southern and western forms of the kirkii-complex in East Africa may be more similar to the widely disjunct damarensis of southern Africa than they are to nearby kirkii, the nominate, northeasternmost form.
This raises the possibility that there are two species, one of them extremely disjunct - in a biogeographic parallel to sympatric Raphicerus campestris, which also shows wide disjunction between southern and East Africa.
These would be
If so, the basic geographical feature separating the two spp. would be the eastern arm of the Great African Rift (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Rift_Valley#/media/File:Great_Rift_Valley.png), from Lake Turkana (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Turkana) in the north to Lake Manyara (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Manyara) in the south.
Such geographical separation would be analogous with that previously recognised between
The following show the buttock flag in Madoqua guentheri:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/108449533
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/109570355.
The following shows that there is no analogous flag in cavendishi/thomasi:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/34632953.
GUENTHERI
Many photos of M. guentheri show a whitish horizontal mark on the hindquarters (just below the small tail), which I have never seen in any other species in the genus:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/44891973
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/48668687
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/92503134
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/46592563
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/42815125
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/34171472
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/10498051
This indicates a fur-fold which opens out into a broad, white, buttock flag.
This resembles the buttocks in Raphicerus campestris (https://dewetswild.com/tag/steenbok/#jp-carousel-37747). However, it is more pronounced, with a more complex, origami-like unfolding - both vertically and horizontally - of panels of pelage.
KIRKII (nominate)
The following show that there is more extensive white on the hindquarters than in damarensis.
This white pelage is visible without any particular activation, partly because the panel of grizzled, grey pelage of the outer buttock is shorter than in damarensis, thomasi, and cavendishi.
The adaptive colouration thus seems to confirm that damarensis is a different species from nominate kirkii, and not merely a subspecies.
second photo in https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/130962038
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104469910
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104465769
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/56610068
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/127865878
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/6998029
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/19215378
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/54460753
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104983315
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/53348887
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/36294376
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/135184955
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/66263881
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104982491
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/66064513
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104982477
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104982469
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/66101649
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104982481
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104982488
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104982474
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104982464
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/94054422
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/94037750
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/54885436
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/67329073
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/43545138
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/57490463
The following shows that the whitish on the buttocks can be seen at some distance:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/67328340
The following is the only photo of nominate kirkii, in posteriolateral view, that could be confused with damarensis on the basis of the colouration of the hindquarters: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104982462.
HINDEI
The following show that considerably more white is visible on the hindquarters than in damarensis. This seems, at least partly, because the pelage of the outer buttock is shorter than that of damarensis.
Whether this qualifies as a buttock flag remains unclear, because this would depend on
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/93574203
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/106353312
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/69253350
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/65705924
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104985979
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/88356487
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/38088841
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/49698957
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/9839405
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/120567853
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/106400612
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/136176636
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/132019130
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/106400622
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/7094056
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104985978
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103589197
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/63258767
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/68337080
The following, at the lower Tana River in eastern Kenya, do not show any white on the buttocks:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/8035356
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/8035355.
CAVENDISHI
The following show that, if white is more evident on the hindquarters of cavendishi than on those of damarensis, the difference is slight.
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102103762
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/121609294
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/121987458
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/28289382
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/130009932
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/126027728
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/54027328
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/108501982
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/108373392
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/107139654
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/107139648
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/105392544
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103901346
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/95525881
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/85640172
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/68957254
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/31994682
The following individual shows the maximum extent of whitish on the buttocks:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/43172082.
THOMASI
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/21312691
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/7812390
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/764507
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/61868136
The following does show some white on the buttocks:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/15041808.
INTERGRADATIONAL between cavendishi and thomasi, in Tarangire and Lake Manyara National Parks, Tanzania:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/19944469
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103939955
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/135088492
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/1818614
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/864173
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/105631501
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/27609142
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/104807392
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/128035858
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102033238
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/97421799
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/93832001
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/90118758
The following, in Arusha National Park, look like thomasi rather than hindei:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/67200531
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/8708916.
DAMARENSIS
The following show that the occurrence of whitish on the hindquarters is limited to the inner surface of the upper hindleg, with hardly any sign of any extension on to the buttocks.
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/41807012
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/37693539
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/86033865
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/99881333
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/37625508
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/9704334
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/52150014
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/39830600
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/14293979
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/128717848
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/14702761
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/25626334
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/33784213
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/107650742
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/90441472
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/85993599
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/85739109
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/83787773
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/33126151
Second photo in https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/74072495
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/65453512
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/59859034
tail raised, revealing the black bare skin around anus:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/66833293
The following does show some white:
https://www.alamy.com/a-damara-dik-dik-or-kirks-dik-dik-maquoda-kirkii-in-grass-during-the-wet-season-at-erindi-reserve-in-erongo-region-namibia-image367603484.html?imageid=BE2F0F65-D863-4D63-B019-455BE8C48547&p=767630&pn=1&searchId=a091ff7a0a8c31eef18a8931488c16a4&searchtype=0.
Σχόλια
damarensis:
https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=dikdik&asset_id=60051921
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/41807012
nominate kirkii:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103120227
See my comments in https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/85335207.
kirkii
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-dik-dik-in-the-national-reserve-of-africa-kenya-103092836.html?imageid=91D6EE71-4E7B-4EB4-A7CE-3B3574C566D8&p=280977&pn=1&searchId=a091ff7a0a8c31eef18a8931488c16a4&searchtype=0
cavendishi
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-male-kirks-dik-dik-antelope-madoqua-kirkii-shows-preorbital-gland-172140622.html?imageid=AFFF10AF-F47D-4B50-83AB-4F5C17C64EAB&p=38682&pn=2&searchId=812e1b51f3bb17a7cc79ddae25b30690&searchtype=0
MADOQUA SALTIANA
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-salts-or-phillips-dik-dik-modaqua-saltiana-acacia-scrub-undergrowth-43269528.html?imageid=294DEE14-C6E6-4BEF-AE03-C57A801464A7&p=77483&pn=2&searchId=812e1b51f3bb17a7cc79ddae25b30690&searchtype=0
Scroll in https://iglobal.net/2016/08/23/samburu-national-reserve-safari/
Excellent photo of Madoqua guentheri, mislabelled on the Web:
https://www.naturephoto-cz.com/kirks-dik-dik-photo-19738.html
https://www.agefotostock.com/age/en/details-photo/dik-dik-standing-lateral-madoqua-kirkii/SSJ-125255
Hi Antoni, Many thanks for your insights and for all the information concerning the differences among the taxa of Madoqua as concerns the extent and display of the white on the rump. Yours looks to be a valuable contribution to what we know about the phenotypic and behavioural differences within Madoqua. I have been travelling and have yet to run through all of the images that you cite. Will do so when time allows. Best regards, Tom
Προσθήκη σχόλιου